|
Reverend
Know-It-All
"What I don't know... I can always make up!" |
|
![]()
|
Letter
to Harold “Hoot” and Annie Gibson cont. part 17START THE BUBBLE MACHINE! We are in the home stretch. Now we begin the rapid descent into liturgical silliness. The Benedictine abbey of Solesmes was destroyed during the French Revolution, only to be re-founded in 1832. There began a movement to restore classical Catholic practices, and to return to the style of worship common the Middle Ages. Pope Leo XIII specifically asked the Benedictine Order of monks to lead the restoration of the Roman liturgy to its classic form. And why did the liturgy need reform? It had been overwhelmed by pop music. Granted, that pop music was written by the likes of Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven and that crowd, but it was still pop music and had little to do with the music that had come to us from the temple in Jerusalem and the early Church. The Masses of the classical and romantic eras became great performance pieces that just happened to be hung on the skimpy skeleton of the Roman Catholic Mass. The Mass itself can take as little as a half hour. The music for Beethoven’s Missa Solemnis takes about 80 minutes. I remember the Masses of my youth when father and the congregation would have to sit as the choir sang an interminable Gloria or Credo. It was great music, very entertaining and inspiring but it had little to do with Calvary. Such grand spectacles still pass for traditionalism. I remember a Mass a few years back that had Mozart’s Requiem as its musical accompaniment, one of the most beautiful and moving pieces of music ever written. I was a bit shocked when a lot of people got up and left the church during the Sanctus. Apparently Mozart died before finishing the whole Mass and others composed the rest using bits and pieces, some written by Mozart, some not. The real Mozart aficionados weren’t going to stay for the lesser parts of the Mass, like the Agnus Dei and all that stuff the priest was doing up at the altar, like making the Creator of the universe present in the form of bread and wine. The purpose of the Liturgical Movement of the 19th century was to return the Mass to its simplicity and timeless beauty after a couple centuries of such pious entertainments. Remember all that American exceptionalism that I have spent the last three months explaining? Now I’d like to talk about a couple of exceptional Americans and their international post-war influence. Monsignor Frederick Richard McManus was exactly the kind of person who embodied the American Church at its zenith. He was Massachusetts born and bread and attended the Second Vatican Council as an expert (peritus) on the liturgy and member of the council's Liturgy Commission. He wrote large hunks of the Vatican Council document “Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy” (Sacrosanctum Concilium). He was president of the Liturgical Conference from 1959–62 and again in 1964-65. He was key in establishing the Federation of Diocesan Commissions in 1968. He was a member of the International Commission on Englis h
in the Liturgy (ICEL) for most of its early history. He was brilliant and very
influential in steering the Church in the direction he thought it should go.
Among his many accomplishments, one affects us today more than any other. He
presided at the first large public celebration of Eucharist facing the assembly,
not including those said at papal Masses and some smaller experimental Masses.
As far as I can tell, this was the first of its kind. It happened at the opening
Mass of the 1962 Liturgical Week in Seattle where people had a “...quite unique
opportunity to experienceaggiornamento (an Italian word meaning
“modernization”) It was the year of the Worlds Fair, Century 21, and the
ubiquitous images of the Space Needle were a constant reminder of the future and
what it might hold. The local Church joined wholeheartedly in the events of the
exposition... And in August, at the Worlds Fair Arena, the Archdiocese of
Seattle hosted a kind of liturgical Century 21: the 23rd annual North American
Liturgical Week, a major instrument of liturgical renewal in the United States.”
There you have it all: modernity, the space needle, America, the worlds Fair and a non-papal Mass facing the people for the first time in a large, public, official Catholic event, and Boston’s own Father McManus doing the honors. The whole thing was seen as a kind of warm up for the Vatican council. “The theme for the week was ‘Thy Kingdom Come: Christian Hope in the
Modern World’, and the link to the Council was not lost on the Holy Father, who
sent his apostolic blessing to all the participants in the Liturgical Week...
During the Liturgical Week, the people of Seattle had an opportunity to
experience what the liturgy could be like... as a huge assembly gathered on
three sides of the temporary altar in the Arena. A lay commentator stood at a
lectern in the sanctuary, offering succinct explanations — in English! — of the
various parts of the Mass. The choir was placed close to the altar, not in a far
off gallery; and the people joined in the spoken and sung responses and in the
singing of hymns. It was a little taste of the future.” (refer to “Liturgy
Notes”, newsletter of the Seattle Cathedral Liturgy Office, article by Corinna
Laughlin, Director of Liturgy.) So there you have it. Father, later Monsignor,
McManus and his associates had decided that the early Church must have faced the
congregation. They were experts, after all.Rembert Weakland is our next exceptional American. He entered the Benedictines in 1945 and was solemnly professed at Solesmes Abbey in France, where the Liturgical Movement had begun around 1832. He studied music in Europe, Columbia University and the Juilliard School and went on to teach music. In 1964, Pope Paul VI appointed him consultor to the Commission for Implementing the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy. He became abbot primate of the Benedictine order in 1967 and later archbishop of Milwaukee whence he ended his remarkable and distinguished career beginning his retirement in 2002. There is a particular part of his distinguished career that should interest us in our search for the origins of the hootenanny Mass... Weakland served as President of the Church Music Association of America, and as chairman of its Music Advisory Board, a committee formed in 1965 to assist the Bishops’ Committee on the Liturgy. At its February 1966 meeting, the Music Advisory Board was presented with a proposal for the use of guitars and folk music in the liturgy. I quote a disenchanted former member of the board, Msgr. Richard Schuler, author of the enlightening essay “a Chronicle of the Reform.” “It was clear at the meeting that Archabbot Weakland was most anxious to obtain the board's approval.... Vigorous debate considerably altered the original proposal, and a much modified statement about music for special groups was finally approved by a majority of one, late in the day when many members had already left. This statement on “Music for Special Groups” observed that “different groupings of the faithful respond to different styles of music,” and said that in services specifically for high school or college age young people “the choice of music which is meaningful to persons of this age level should be considered valid and purposeful.” It specified that such music should not be used at ordinary parish Masses.- "...incongruous melodies and texts, adapted from popular ballads, should be avoided.” Still, that is not quite where the hootenanny Mass got its start. As early as 1964, the National Catholic Reporter ran a story about Sacred Heart, the "hootenanny parish" in Warrensburg, Mo. To paraphrase a Bob Dylan song, “the times, they were peculiar.” Things were already getting strange by 1958. In the October, 1958 edition of the Catholic magazine “Jubilee”, there appeared an article on John Redmond’s recording “The Ten Commandments/the Seven Sacraments” including such inspiring songs as “The Ten Commandments Song”, “Extreme Unction” and the ever popular, “Why Do We Tip Our Hats to a Priest?” The article mentions that:
Guitars or folk music are not mentioned, but the
previously quoted “Statement for Special Groups”, but with Weakland’s help and
that of a few others, the statement was taken for official approval of the
"hootenanny Mass" later called folk or guitar Masses. And so it was that the
hootenanny Mass became the gold standard for all that was modern. Weakland was
critical of the decisions of the Vatican Council when he said that “...false
liturgical orientation gave birth to what we call the treasury of sacred music
and false judgments perpetuated it.” His was the proper liturgical orientation
and one of his orientations was the guitar Mass. He dismissed the organic
tradition of the liturgy and used his considerable influence to make the
Catholic Mass unrecognizable, all in the Spirit of Vatican II. |
![]() |
|