
Letter to Harold “Hoot” and
Annie Gibson cont. part 20
LIGHTS,
ACTION, LITURGY!
So why
is it that we are beset by Pascal Turkeys and stage dramas? St. John the Dwarf
wrote in his spiritual classic The Dyspeptikon that “Only those remain in
the priesthood who have deep faith in and love for the real presence of our Lord
in the Blessed Sacrament, or those who are hoping for a corner office down at
diocesan headquarters.” Faith and the love of God are not indispensable
requirements for employment in the field of religion. Have you ever heard of
“church-craft”. There are people who are very good at the business of religion.
They may be holy, or they may be less than holy. They may be clergy, or they may
be laity. It matters not. They are just plain good at the business of religion.
I was
alarmed a few weeks ago at a regional meeting of clergy and diocesan office
wonks, when a young priest used the phrase “salvation of souls.” He said it
right out loud! In my 40 plus years of attending such meetings, I had never
heard anyone use this phrase. It has always fascinated me that one can meet
with dozens, even hundreds of religious workers, ordained and non-ordained, and
after the opening prayer, not hear the divinity so much as mentioned until the
final prayer. In my life as a priest I have attended perhaps ten thousand
meetings. (Conservatively estimating, that’s 37 years in the clerical state, at
a rate of 4 meetings a week). At present, I can only remember three or four of
those meetings.
I have
now participated in about four or five programs to revive the church. I have
participated in at least as many fund drives that would solve our financial
problems. I cannot count the liturgy meetings, the planning meetings, the
meetings to evaluate the meeting to prepare for the meeting that we have not yet
had, but will have at some not too distant date. Every meeting seems to generate
a new committee, or surface a new need for which a diocesan agency is absolutely
necessary. That agency will of course send out important mail and devise new
programs to meet the crying need, whatever it may be, and all employees,
volunteers and carbon based life forms walking within twenty yards of a church
building will have to attend, lest we be accused of insensitivity to the plight
of left handed Bosnians, or whatever oppressed victim is the new cause
celebre.
I say
this having been a diocesan office wonk myself for at least twenty years. (At
least two meetings a week.) I was also a pastor at the time. I decided to
collect all the diocesan mail that I received in one month and bring it to a
meeting of my department. I staggered in to the main office under an Everest of
mail. My colleagues were appalled at the amount of mail we bureaucrats
generated. If I remember correctly, someone suggested that an office be opened
to deal with the problem and that a mailing be sent out on the subject.
Now
things are much better. The mail comes by computer and everyone knows how
computers have reduced the junk mail problem. In all those mountains of very
important mail; and all those important meetings, I cannot remember a single
incidence of anyone seriously asking what God Almighty might think about the
situation. That is why, when that young priest said something like “the
salvation of souls” he might have as well have made an unfortunate digestive
sound.
“Why”
you may ask, “have you gone on this rant when you are trying to get to the end
of this interminable history?” Simply this. There is no manual of marital
technique that can save a loveless marriage, and there is no number of meetings
or programs that can substitute for deep and passionate faith. Church-craft is
killing the church. She can only be revived by conversion. Those thousands of
meetings I mentioned, for the most part, had all the passion of a lecture on how
to repair the Xerox machine. Some people who work in the business of religion
love the Lord with all their hearts and souls. Some do not. Zippy, zingy
technique cannot save a marriage when love has died. So too, theatrical liturgy
cannot replace faith. I am getting old. People like me who remember the
tradition are getting fewer. A few men, who were considered “experts” forced the
Church into radical separation from the unbroken continuity of her liturgical
history during the twentieth century. I suspect these experts were really good
at church-craft.
The Holy
Spirit said very clearly in the Vatican Council that the Church must adapt to a
changing world. The Council Fathers had no idea just how much the world was
about to change. The “experts” were given permission to make a few adjustments.
They made more than a few. It was a little like telling your 19-year old child,
“Now while we’re visiting your great uncle Reinhold down in Boca Vista Palma
Bella, you can have a few friends over, but nothing wild and NO beer!”
Inevitably you will come to a smoking ruin, a gaping hole where your little
cottage with the white picket fence had been, and you will be living in a motel
for quite a while.
The
generation of juvenile delinquents who burned down the house of the Lord is
approaching 70 and 80 now, and they are being replaced by their bureaucratic
protégés who never saw what Mass was like before Broadway was baptized. They
think tradition is big. It involves glitter and orchestras. If it’s in Latin it
must be Catholic.
The
infection of theatrical liturgy is everywhere. There is no more pious community
than the Asian Catholics who made up half of my parish back at Sts. Dismal and
Precipitous in the Harbor District of Frostbite Falls. They emigrated to this
country at its liturgical low point and all the young clergy and seminarians
took courses at Christian Technical Underwriters on the south side of Frostbite
Falls. There they learned that stuff from the old country, like rosaries,
novenas and quiet Masses had been done away with by the Vatican Council. So they
developed grand liturgies with huge choirs that sang hymns set to tango
melodies. ( I am not making this up).
I
remember a young Asian man who ran up to me breathlessly as curtain time for
Mass approached. He asked me if he should put the microphone up on the “stage.”
I was about to go into a long disquisition pointing that it was an altar, not a
“stage,” but I just looked at him and said “Yeah. Go put it up on the stage.” It
had in fact ceased to be an altar. It was a stage and there would be no
sacrifice, only a kind of community meeting in the midst of a stage performance.
We have liturgy offices filled with generations of young church-crafters for
whom the Hollywood extravaganza is the only paradigm they have for liturgy.
They have never seen the real thing. Isn’t that a little extreme? Hollywood
extravaganza? Let me tell you a few stories.
I
remember a little old lady who was pretty much as deaf as a stone. She had been
away from the church and her daughter, an active Catholic took her to the Easter
Mass one year. She was a little surprised when, in the sanctuary she found ducks
and bunnies in a kind of Easter display. That wasn’t what she remembered as a
Catholic. The next year she gave it another shot, and this time they had
constructed a rather elaborate display for the Easter Holy Water. It was a sort
of babbling brook. They made some of the older parishioners uncomfortable during
longer services, but were all the rage for a while. You still see them
sometimes. Our stone deaf grandma who didn’t see too well either, heard the
sound and asked her daughter what it was. Her daughter tried to tell her that it
was a babbling brook. To which our heroine responded at the top of her voice,
“WHAT? BABOONS? LAST YEAR IT WAS POULTRY! HAVE THESE PEOPLE LOST THEIR MINDS?”
Yes, Grandma. They have lost their minds.
Liturgical chic is now cranked out by experts on a regular basis. Priests,
deacons and religious are required to pray the liturgy of the hours daily. I
remember a liturgical show that passed for vespers at a priests' conference not
too long ago. It was beautiful. Pure George Gershwin. “Summertime, and we’re
gonna have vespers....” One of the most requested funeral hymns these days is
that old religious favorite “I did it my way....”
Rev.
Neinbaum, my former liturgy teacher encouraged us “...try to put a little
pizzazz in your sermons, gentlemen.” We have had enough liturgical pizzazz to
last until the Lord’s return. Liturgical improvisation seems to be the order of
the day. It is not uncommon to hear a priest preach four or five miniature
sermons during a Mass, all in an attempt to improve on the basic product. For
example:“This is the Lamb of God, the Lamb sacrificed, the Lamb who loves us,
the Lamb who is a gentle and non-violent creature, this little Lamb who is
Jesus, who radical separation from the unbroken continuity of loves us, yadda,
yadda, yadda.....” To which we are expected to respond, “Lord, I am not
worthy...”
At this
point one is lost and looking to find his place in the missalette and wondering
if he should have brought mint jelly with him. You are not lost, friend. It is
the celebrant who has wandered off. And always with deep emotional feeling and
long dramatic pauses. Father, we are there for Christ, not for you. In
particular, I remember the sad funeral of a seminarian. The priest who offered
the funeral Mass was a raging thespian and gave it all he had. He held his arms
straight out as far as he could, like a man crucified, and beseeched heaven with
weeping and long soliloquies. I was tempted to go up, tug on his chasuble and
remind him that the guest of honor was in the coffin. I believe he has since
left the business of religion to pursue his thespian dreams elsewhere.
I am so
tired of hearing people say that they don’t get anything out Mass. You don’t
go to Mass to get something. You go to give something. You go to Mass to
give your life to Christ who has given His life for you. You offer him your
flesh and blood and He in turn gives you His Flesh and Blood. It’s called a
covenant. St Paul says that we make up in our flesh what is lacking in the
sufferings of Christ. (Col. 1:24)
What
could possibly be lacking in the sufferings of Christ? There is a beautiful old
prayer called the Morning Offering:
“O Jesus, through the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I offer You my prayers,
works, joys and sufferings of this day in union with the Holy Sacrifice of
the Mass throughout the world, in reparation for my sins, and for the
salvation of souls.”
There
are many variations of the prayer, and it usually includes prayer for the
intentions of the pope. The important thing is that it unites our joys and
sorrows to those of Christ. We join Him as co-redeemers of the world as he asked
us to do. (John 14:12-14 “I tell you the truth. The person that believes in me
will do the same things I have done. Yes! He will do even greater things than I
have done.”) That is the meaning of Mass. It is the perfect sacrifice that
allows me who am no one, to climb up on the cross with Him for love of the
Father and for love of the world that He so loved. We have become so shallow
that we think Mass is an entertainment designed to cure our boredom for a little
while, forgetting that it is the un-bloody re-presentation of Calvary’s
sacrifice.
One more
story. A new bishop came to the diocese and there was a grand Mass to welcome
him. There were two, count them, two choirs, one in front and one in back.
Afterwards, the overheated cathedral choir director asked me if I thought the
new bishop liked it. I said, “I’m sure he was very pleased. I hope God enjoyed
it as much as the bishop did.” Church-craft. We are killing the Church with
church-craft, but at least we do not lack for entertainment on the way down.
Next
week LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL. LET US HOPE IT IS NOT A FREIGHT TRAIN. |