 |

Dear Rev. Know it all,
I was out in the suburbs this
past Sunday and stopped at St. Vatsnu’s Church in Rolling Bluff Oak Terrace
Vistas for Mass. I was a bit taken aback. First there was sand in the holy water
fountain and then there was a glorious liturgical dance in which some nun in a
diaphanous gown and a body stocking twirled up to the altar with what appeared
to be a Mexican bean pot belching clouds of incense. Were these changes
mandated by the Second Vatican Council?
Yours,
Patience X. Austed
Dear Patience,
No, these changes were not
mandated by the Second Vatican Council. They were probably mandated by a second-string team of unemployed department store window decorators, or a pastor who
considers himself avant garde. I have seen the bean pot incense thing
and I worked in the Spanish speaking world for many years. When I see a bean
pot/incense burner, I always wonder, “Who burned the beans?” As for the sand in
the holy water fountain, it is absolutely forbidden. Allow me to quote:
CONGREGATION DE CULTU DIVINO ET DISCIPLINA SACRAMENTORUM
Prot. N.
569/00/L
March 14,
2000
Dear
Father:
This
Congregation for Divine Worship has received your letter sent by fax in which
you ask whether it is in accord with liturgical law to remove the Holy Water
from the fonts for the duration of the season of Lent. This Dicastery is able to
respond that the removing of Holy Water from the fonts during the season of Lent
is not permitted, in particular, for two reasons:
1. The
liturgical legislation in force does not foresee this innovation, which in
addition to being beyond the law, is contrary to a balanced understanding of the
season of Lent, which though truly being a season of penance, is also a season
rich in the symbolism of water and baptism, constantly evoked in liturgical
texts.
2. The
encouragement of the Church that the faithful avail themselves frequently of her
sacraments and sacramentals is to be understood to apply also to the season of
Lent. The "fast" and "abstinence" which the faithful embrace in this season does
not extend to abstaining from the sacraments or sacramentals of the Church.
The
practice of the Church has been to empty the Holy Water fonts on the days of the
Sacred Triduum in preparation of the blessing of the water at the Easter Vigil,
and it corresponds to those days on which the Eucharist is not celebrated (i.e.,
Good Friday and Holy Saturday). Hoping that this resolves the question and with
every good wish and kind regard, I am,
Sincerely
yours in Christ, [signed]
Mons.
Mario Marini
Undersecretary
So, the practice of emptying
the Holy Water font during lent is forbidden, no matter what your pastor and or
liturgy committee say. They may counter with “Who the heck does Mons. Mario
Marini think he is anyway?” He is the person delegated by the Pope to comment on
these things. (the Pope, remember him? The cheerful Bavarian with the white
beanie?) Once again the silliness and endless innovation of the modern era cause
us to ask, “What the heck is going on anyway!?!”
It’s really quite simple. It
started with Eve and the apple. (I can hear someone shouting even as I write
“There that chauvinist goes again, blaming women for the whole mess!” It is
clear that the devil had to get to the woman first, because, as any reasonable
man knows, men are, in fact, the weaker sex.) Instead of explaining away the
text as a creation myth like any other creation myth, why don’t we try to
understand what the story tells us about the human condition? It seems that the
first human beings were presented with the opportunity to be children of God.
They opted instead for equality with God. Allow me to quote once again. “The
woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but
God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the
garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.' "
"You will
not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you
eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and
evil." (Gen 3:2-5)
So there it is: the Original
Sin, the refusal to be children of God. It is insistence on independent
adulthood. “Nobody is gonna tell me nuthin! I got my rights!” That’s why Jesus
says “I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like
a little child will never enter it.” (Mark 10:15) Let us jump ahead a few eons,
to the Renaissance, famous for sculpture, music, really neat clothing and poofy
hats. The motto of the Renaissance was “Man is the measure of all things.” Now
let us jump ahead a few more years to Rene Descartes, who said in 1637 in his
Discourse on Method, “I think therefore I am.” The Discourse on
Method was the beginning of the Age of Enlightenment, which ended by
enlightening people through cutting off their heads in the French Revolution of
1789. That would certainly make people a few pounds lighter.
A great advocate of
enlightenment, French-style revolution and occasional head-chopping was our own
Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence and the owner of 267
slaves. (This, in 1822 long after he had railed against the slave trade. The man
was about as consistent a thinker as a sugar-crazed 4-year old.) Thomas took the
great ideas of the Enlightenment and gave us the stirring words of the
Declaration, “Life, Liberty and the Purfuit, (or as we now write it “pursuit”)
of Happiness!” He failed to define happiness. In his case it seemed to involve
the ownership of lots of other human beings. Thus it moved from, “We will be
like God” to “Man is the measure of all things,” to “My personal happiness is
the measure of right and wrong.” So, the pastor of St. Vatsnu’s couldn’t give a
good gosh darn for what Mons. Mario Marini in Rome has to say.
St. Paul said about our Lord
Jesus. “Do nothing
out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better
than yourselves. Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but
also to the interests of others. Your attitude should be the same as that of
Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, did not consider equality with God
something to be grasped, but made emptied himself taking the form of a slave,
becoming in human likeness, and being found in appearance as a man, he humbled
himself and became obedient to death...”
(Phil.2:5-8)
It is interesting to contrast
the humility of God with the arrogance of some who claim to be His servants.
Yours,
Rev. Know-it-all
|