 |

Dear Rev. Know it all,
I am a believer in God. Not
the Christian God, but my own personal God with which I've had my spiritual
experiences. My question is this; why do SO many people automatically assume
that to believe in God, one believes in Christ. I do not believe in Christ. I
personally think that Jesus' story is shrouded in myth, fiction, and human
intervention. Why are these two ideas (God & Jesus) so inherently connected? My
belief in God is so strong that for me to take the leap of Christian faith is to
take a giant leap in a very strange direction.
Thank you,
N. Fidel
Dear Mr. Fidel,
Let us be a little more
precise. Perhaps I am misinterpreting your remarks, but I would venture that you
don’t believe in God. “Believe” or “to have faith” originally means “to trust
in.” I don’t’ know whether or not you trust in your personal god. I suspect that
when you say you believe God exists you are really saying that you think God
exists. I would agree. God most certainly exists. God exists by definition. “God
is that being greater than which nothing exists.” God is the Supreme Being.
More simply put God is the greatest reality that is, and there is most certainly
a greatest reality. The question is, “What is the nature of God?” A lot of
people think that somehow the universe is self-creating. In that case, the
universe is god, an unfeeling, unperceiving, uncaring hunk of impersonal rocks
swirling meaninglessly through an unbroken, silent, eternal monotony. There is
nothing there to trust. Others have decided that god is personal, a kind of nice
guy who minds his own business. He/she made all things and then went on an
eternal lunch break leaving us to do pretty much what we please because he/she
isn’t terribly interested in the current state of his/her creation. These people
are called Deists. Not much to trust there either. You’ve got nature lovers and
wiccans who believe that the universe or nature is somehow personal and benign
except when he/she throws up the occasional tsunami or volcano and needs to be
placated by some ritual or sacrifice because balance has been upset and he/she
is perfectly right to be in a cosmic snit.
Hinduism is a lovely religion
that has lots of gods that ancient invaders brought to the subcontinent and all
those gods are somehow manifestations of the “One.” Buddhism is a development of
Hinduism in which God is optional. It’s purpose seems to be to escape the cycle
of suffering by right living that leads to personal oblivion. Then you’ve got
Islam which teaches an arbitrary, unknowable god who has chosen some for eternal
happiness and others for eternal hell-fire. There are a lot of other religions
that are variations on these themes. And then there’s you, who have created a
god for yourself based on some spiritual experiences you’ve had.
My question is this: “Why do
you think your god is God?” There are only two kinds of religion as far as I
can tell. A sort of pantheism claiming that nature is God, personal or
impersonal. The great bulk of human religions from the cavemen to Carl Sagan fit
into this first group. They rely on human reason or ancient myths. Then there
are the Abrahamic faiths, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, which derive from
Abraham’s encounter with God about four thousand years ago. Judaism relies on a
long and consistent process of revelation over the course of a thousand years.
Islam claims its authority
from Mohammed to whom God spoke while he was in a cave in the desert. The
revelations he claims to have received in his private spiritual experiences are
thought by Muslims to be the definitive and only truly authoritative word of
God, one book, the Koran, dictated to one man, Muhammad over the course of 23
years of one life, 610 to 632 AD. He never actually wrote anything down, His
friends wrote it down for him and compiled it after his death. So you are in
good company. You’ve had private spiritual revelations, so did Muhammad.
Myself, I’m not so sure about private revelations. If there are lots of
spiritual beings out there and some of them are not so nice, like the devil and
his angels, who knows who you’ve been spiritually schmoozing with? Even Muhammad
had his doubts until his wife convinced him that his revelations were the real
thing. Christianity however is uniquely unique in all of this.
Christianity makes a really
outlandish claim. It claims that the Creator of the universe once visited his
creation. When He did so, He appeared not as a theologian or priest, not as a
general, king, or hero. He appeared as a Jewish carpenter, born in a barn,
executed for treason. The reason we believe this is that something very amazing
happened. He rose from the dead. You say that you “personally think that Jesus'
story is shrouded in myth, fiction, and human intervention.” Quite the opposite
is true. Christianity flows from a precise and public event that happened in a
precise time in an exact place.
The earliest documents that
we have attesting to this amazing fact were written about 50 AD. St. Paul’s
letters to the Thessalonians were written about 20 years after the event by a
man who gladly allowed himself to be executed by the government for his belief
that the Carpenter had risen from the dead. If St. Paul was the only one who
believed this, I would just chalk it up to personal lunacy, but almost all of
those who were witnesses to the resurrection of Jesus had so little fear of
death that they likewise gave themselves up for execution when it would have
been easy to avoid it, just by saying, “Well, maybe I was mistaken...”
This is quite different from
the Islamic revelation. The followers of Muhammad who compiled his revelations
in the Koran were happy to execute others for the sake of their “truth.” From
its beginning, Islam has been a warrior faith. Christianity is quite the
opposite. Christians believed so strongly in the resurrection that they were
willing, not to kill for the truth, but to be killed. I can hear you now, “What
about the Crusades and other religious wars?” Can I help it if some idiots
decided to kill in the name of Christ? Perhaps they too had their private
revelations. The Prince of Peace, the murdered Carpenter of Nazareth, never
asked anyone to kill in His name. Muhammad, on the other hand, demanded it.
If you really think that the
basic Christian revelation is shrouded in “myth and fiction and human
intervention,” I would like to challenge you to read a book, “The DaVinci Hoax”
by Carl E. Olson and Sandra Miesel published by Ignatius Press, 2004, ISBN
1-58617-034-1. I would also invite you to read C.S. Lewis “Surprised by Joy.” He
deals with the same issue. I could go on endlessly about the miracles and
wonders of the Christian tradition that have re-enforced the power of God made
visible in the resurrection of Jesus, but you would probably write them off.
Better than all this however,
there is one more thing that I would suggest. Find a very quiet Catholic Church
where there is a tabernacle containing the Blessed Sacrament, (the remaining
consecrated communion wafers). Sit there, take a deep breath and say, “Jesus, if
you really are God-in-the-flesh, I would like to know you, and if you are who
you say you are, I will give you my life.” Not only do we believe that God once
visited His creation, but we believe that He has chosen to remain here because
He loves you. That you can trust!
Yours,
Rev. Know-it-all
|